๐Ÿ”’

Staff Update

Enter the password to access this page.

Incorrect password. Please try again.
WKT ยท Accountability Chart Update

Where we are with the Accountability Chart โ€” and what comes next.

A staff update from Glenn. The top of the chart is settled. The next layer is in motion. The Town Hall is on June 18.

From: Glenn Bosch  ยท  Date: May 28, 2026  ยท  For: All WKT staff
Start here

The 8-minute walkthrough

If you want the picture in Glenn's voice, watch the video. The rest of this page is the same information in written form โ€” built so you can come back to it as a reference.

โ–ถ
Accountability Chart Update โ€” Glenn Bosch โ‰ˆ 8 minutes  ยท  Recorded in Teams
Watch video
First, the terminology

What an Accountability Chart is โ€” and what it isn't

An Accountability Chart shows what each seat owns. An org chart shows who reports to whom. They are deliberately different.

An org chart answers a structural question. Who reports up to whom. Who manages whom. Where each person sits in the formal hierarchy. It's useful for HR, payroll, and the lines of authority.

An Accountability Chart answers a different question. For each seat at the top of the company โ€” what does this seat own? What decisions does it get to make? What is it on the hook for? It is the map of accountability, not of management.

The two often look similar. They are not the same. WKT now has both. The Accountability Chart is what the company runs from. The org chart still exists alongside it.

EOS โ€” the operating system WKT uses โ€” separates these two charts on purpose. It forces clarity on accountability without forcing it through the reporting structure. The result is decisions made at the right seat, not pulled up by default.

Status

Where we are right now

The top of the chart is settled. The next layer is in motion. The Town Hall is in three weeks.

For several months, the leadership team has been redesigning how WKT is organized at the top. On May 12, the team sat together, worked the chart, tested every seat, and endorsed the architecture.

Since then, the focus has shifted to the layer below โ€” the roles inside each function. That work runs through early June. The full picture, including everything below the leadership tier, will be communicated at a Town Hall on June 18.

This update is the air cover before the Town Hall. The intent is simple: when new terms start showing up in conversation, you'll know what they mean and where they came from.

Effective immediately

The accountabilities on this page are in place โ€” today.

The people named in the seats are operating in this model now. This is not a future state. It is the operating model in motion as of this week.

Expect some adjustment. Building the muscle memory to route decisions to the right seat โ€” instead of where those decisions used to go โ€” takes practice. Give it the time it needs. If a decision lands on the wrong desk, redirect it. That's how the model gets real.

The shape

Three tiers

WKT runs on three tiers. Each tier does a different kind of work. The boundaries between them matter.

I
Leadership
Visionary ยท Chief of Staff ยท Integrator
โ†•
II
Strategy & Industry
Strategy & Industry Authority โ€” Nick
โ†•
III
Operations
RevOps ยท R&D ยท Corporate

Strategy and direction flow downward. Customer signal, market shifts, and operating reality flow back up. The chart is the architecture; the loop is what makes it work.

The seven seats

What each seat owns, and why it exists

Seven seats at the top of the company. Three at the leadership tier. One at the strategy tier. Three at the operations tier. The leadership team โ€” the L10 โ€” runs from these seven.

The V/I relationship โ€” in its simplest form: the Visionary sets the strategy for the company. The Integrator is responsible for executing that strategy. The Chief of Staff keeps the cadence between them. Every seat below them is designed to serve that division of labour.

Tier 1 ยท Leadership

Visionary Settled

Chris Labossiere

What this seat owns

  • Direction, identity, industry pulse
  • Major industry relationships
  • Long-horizon strategic bets
  • Brand identity and external positioning
  • Vision execution as the strategic moat
Why the seat exists: WKT is the kind of company where the Visionary's contribution is the strategic moat. Chris sets the strategy. The work he does upstream โ€” relationships, industry pulse, long-horizon bets โ€” compounds over years. The chart protects that work by giving it a seat with no operational distractions.
Tier 1 ยท Leadership

Chief of Staff Settled

Sue Broderick

What this seat owns

  • Corporate work plan and executive cadence
  • Board and corporate communications
  • Operating discipline
  • Cross-functional initiative tracking
  • Connective tissue across V/I and the Leadership Team
Why the seat exists: The work that holds the leadership team together has been informal and uneven. The Chief of Staff seat names it, owns it, and gives it the standing to set cadence and discipline across the top of the company.
Tier 1 ยท Leadership

Integrator Settled

Glenn Bosch  ยท  President & COO

What this seat owns

  • Operational coherence across the leadership team
  • Cross-functional issue resolution (L10)
  • Function-lead accountability oversight
  • Quarterly Rocks translation
  • Resource allocation across functions
Why the seat exists: The Integrator executes the strategy the Visionary sets. The seat translates direction into operations and exists so the company can run without every cross-functional question reaching the Visionary's desk. The job is to make the operating layer work.
Tier 2 ยท The most important clarification in the chart

Strategy & Industry Authority โ€” Nick Palmieri Settled

This seat is not new work. It is work that has been going on at WKT for years โ€” quietly, informally, mostly carried by Chris, Nick, and a handful of others.

Deep industry expertise is not overhead at WKT. It is the moat. Safety and transportation, financial services, security guard industry, regulated retail, government and stakeholder relationships, the SME network โ€” these are strategic assets, not content-review support.

Until now, that work has lived in the gaps between seats. The chart fixes that.

Strategy & Industry Authority is now a function โ€” peer to RevOps, R&D, and Corporate, not part of any of them. Nick leads it. The seat has decision authority over strategic priorities and pursuits.

What this seat owns

  • Strategic priorities and pursuits
  • Industry intelligence and regulatory monitoring
  • Big-deal selection and Institutional (B2I) relationships โ€” associations, regulators, government
  • Positioning across our publisher brands
  • SME network direction and industry credibility

Why this matters to everyone: The work this function does is upstream of everything else. It decides what WKT goes after. It tells RevOps which customers to chase. It tells R&D which credentials to build. It tells Corporate what regulatory posture to hold. Naming it as a function means we make those decisions deliberately โ€” with a clear owner, real standing, and the authority to shape what we pursue next.

Tier 3 ยท Operations

Head of Revenue Operations Interim

Glenn Bosch  ยท  interim, with active search

What this function owns

  • Pipeline, revenue, and retention as one number
  • Demand, Revenue, and Delivery integrated as one engine
  • Persona ownership coordination across departments
  • RevOps scorecard and shared cadence
  • Cross-functional handoff discipline
Why the seat exists: Demand (Marketing), Revenue (Sales), and Delivery (Customer Support and Account Management) have been operating as separate reporting lines without anyone holding them together. The chart creates one customer-facing engine. Interim does not mean placeholder โ€” the seat is held with full standing while the permanent owner is identified.
How it's designed to work: Revenue Operations โ€” RevOps โ€” is an industry best-practice model for growth companies. It brings what we have traditionally called Marketing (Demand), Sales (Revenue), and Customer Operations (Delivery) under one accountability. One scorecard. One handoff discipline. One customer experience from first click to renewal. The same engine that finds a customer is on the hook for keeping them and growing them.
Tier 3 ยท Operations

Head of R&D Settled

Emma Plumb

What this function owns

  • The convergence of learning and technology as WKT's core capability
  • Unified R&D roadmap โ€” content priorities and platform priorities set together
  • R&D scorecard and learning-technology outcomes
  • AI workflow integration across course authoring, personalization, credential issuance
  • The strategic mandate to build the credentialing infrastructure that is WKT's moat
Why the seat exists: The future of learning is technology-led. The future of educational technology is learning-led. eLearning and Product & Software are not two teams handing assets back and forth โ€” they are one capability applied at different layers. R&D as a single function reflects where the business is going.
Why one consolidated R&D function: Splitting learning content from the technology platform creates handoffs where there should be co-creation. The course team builds for the platform; the platform team builds for the courses. Treating them as one function gives WKT three benefits:
  • A unified roadmap. Content priorities and platform priorities are set together, against the same direction and the same customer signal. We stop trading one off against the other.
  • AI embedded once, used everywhere. Course authoring, learner personalization, credential issuance, content quality โ€” one set of AI workflows running across both teams instead of duplicated effort.
  • A single owner of the moat. WKT's competitive moat is the convergence of learning and technology into credentialing infrastructure. One leader is accountable for that convergence โ€” not two leaders coordinating on it.
Tier 3 ยท Operations

Head of Corporate Interim

Mark Friesen  ยท  fractional / interim

What this function owns

  • Finance and capital management
  • HR, IT, and Legal oversight in transition
  • Board-facing financial reporting
  • Regulatory and compliance posture
  • The run-the-company operational engine
Why the seat exists: Finance, HR, IT, and Legal have been distributed across multiple owners and informal handoffs. The chart consolidates them under one Leadership Team seat. Mark holds it on a fractional, interim basis on top of his CFO role until WKT is large enough to justify a dedicated permanent owner.
Why one consolidated Corporate function: In growth companies our size, the run-the-company functions โ€” Finance, HR, IT, Legal โ€” are typically distributed across multiple owners. That creates gaps, duplicated effort, and decisions that fall between seats. Industry best practice is to consolidate these under a single Leadership Team seat โ€” often called Head of Corporate, Head of People & Operations, or COO of the back office. One person is accountable for the spine that keeps the company running. One scorecard covers compliance, cash, people, and systems. When WKT is large enough to justify a dedicated permanent owner, the function is shaped to take that handoff cleanly.

A word on "interim." Two of the seven seats are named interim โ€” Head of RevOps and Head of Corporate. We named them honestly. Interim does not mean placeholder, and it does not mean weak. Interim means the seat is held with full standing while the permanent shape is being worked out โ€” through a senior hire, an internal promotion, or restructuring the function itself. Those conversations are running in parallel with the chart work.

How we serve customers

Three personas โ€” B2C, B2B, B2I

WKT serves three types of customers. Each has a different economic shape, time horizon, and operating posture. The chart names a specific owner for each one โ€” so "we serve three customer types" is an operating discipline, not a slogan.

B2C

B2C Learner

Owned by the Head of Demand (inside RevOps)

Individual learners taking courses for their own credentials. High volume, low touch, marketing-led. Re-engagement is dictated by regulatory recertification cycles. The motion is tight and tactical: capture efficiently, convert well, recover what's lost.

B2B

Corporate Buyer

Owned by the Revenue lead (inside RevOps)

Training Managers and businesses buying seats for their organizations. 10,000+ accounts already in our database โ€” the largest underleveraged asset in the business. The motion is substantial: nurture, expand, surface expansion signals, reactivate dormant accounts.

B2I

Institutional

Owned by Strategy & Industry Authority (Nick)

Associations, regulators, and government. High-value, low-volume, long-cycle relationships. Ownership sits with Strategy & Industry Authority โ€” not RevOps โ€” because the relationship motion is upstream of operational sales. Sales execution still happens inside RevOps; the relationship itself lives with Nick.

Each persona owner is the authoritative voice on how their customer is found, sold to, served, and retained. The function leads (RevOps, R&D, Corporate) build the engine; the persona owners make sure the engine actually serves the customer it was built for.

One note: Reseller is not a fourth persona. It's a sales motion that supports our publisher brands' channel partners, and it lives inside RevOps under Revenue.

What's next

The path to the Town Hall

This update is the air cover. The Town Hall is the full reveal.

Common questions

If you're wondering

Does my job change?
Your job does not change as a result of the Accountability Chart. Roles in the company will be subject to change as the company evolves โ€” that's natural and always. It ties to our core value of being nimble.
Is anyone losing their job because of this?
No. This is about ownership and decision rights at the top of the company, not headcount. No one is losing their job because of the chart.
Is this a reorganization?
No. This is an Accountability Chart โ€” it maps who owns what at the top. An org chart shows reporting; the Accountability Chart shows accountability. The two are deliberately separate. Some reporting lines may shift over time, but this exercise is about ownership and decision rights, not about reshuffling teams.
Why are we doing this now? What changed?
We're not leveraging the full capacity of the team. Too many decisions are pooled with one or two people. That limits our ability to move quick. The chart fixes it.
Why is "Strategy & Industry Authority" being called out?
Because it's the seat that's been doing real work without a real home on the chart. The clarification matters: it gives the work decision authority, a single owner (Nick), and the standing to shape what WKT pursues. It also changes how RevOps, R&D, and Corporate get their direction โ€” from a defined source instead of by default.
What does "interim" mean for Head of RevOps and Head of Corporate?
It means the seat is held with full standing, with documented accountabilities, while the permanent owner is being worked out. It is not a placeholder. Mark and Glenn hold these seats to the same standard the rest of the chart carries.
Who do I talk to if I have questions?
Your direct leader. The leadership team has been briefed and asked to be consistent. If you don't get a clear answer, push. If you still don't get one, the question can come to me.
What happens at the Town Hall?
On June 18 we'll walk the full chart, including the layer below the seven leadership seats. We'll take questions live. Anyone whose role is shifting will already have heard it directly from their leader before that day.